This topic contains 16 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by 
Vyacheslav 1 week, 5 days ago.
-
Posts
-
I’m just curious.
who else preferred the old robox graphic compared to the new cartoony graphic?
first time I saw the new graphic I thought it had mistakenly send wrong instructions to my video-card and had not rendered properly.
but it seems like someone at Cel-robox actually decided that it should look that way.Let’s have a little vote.
who likes the new graphic?
who preferred the old one?I might have mentioned it and/or posted pics. But not complained as some other.
I actually like new graphics from completely different perspective: I was just about to force cartoon style outlines to some of my hobby computer games - just to play with it. I think it is cool!
But, for AM I do like old as it was much clearer and better from UX perspective. And not only graphics but they can Robox shrinks when some ‘pop-ups’ are open. It is really hard clicking on buttons for driving head/filament when Robox is tiny. So, I vote for old and/or fixing new!
Old for me as I find it hard to see printer arrow controls when using white filament
old
the move arrows are definitely a bit hard to see on the new especially with the dual head on but i like the rest of it
old
When I first got my printer and installed AM, I was so impressed with the graphics, thought they were neat, well laid out, professional, usable, informative and attractive, not any more.
- This reply was modified 2 weeks, 5 days ago by Ian.
i definetly like the old one better, new is unfinished looking
Tanel
If the new graphic is to be accepted then the Heated bed, Head & move arrows have to be made clearer with a different colour , old graphic good here, in the case of the move arrows the colours should be stronger and maybe change colour when pointer is over the item. My main downer with the new graphic is the settings.. e.g. <Print Profiles> .. I can’t see all items on my laptop and can’t access them. The screen resolution is 1366×768 which means I have use an external monitor with higher resolution. Screen resolutions of 1280 and higher need to be supported.
Reminds me of DOS and Windows 2, Windows 10 also similar, progress!!!
Windows 2? I can’t say I’ve seen it ever…
@click not surprised by that. It was back in the late 1980s. A link on wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_2.0
the interface graphics were absolutely flat and as for multi tasking… best forgotten:)
old
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
