This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by 
Don Colley 1 day, 6 hours ago.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
-
Posts
-
- Possibly a simple solution depending how the software and firmware is coded. But a kit to increased the height of the build volume.. So can print taller objects. Depends on the market your after plus what the majority of users would like. Don’t think you need to go to massive.. but double the vertical build height would be very useful.
- Make a decision on how far you want to take the Automaker software.. Its good and straight forward but as a serious user producing saleable parts, I use a combination of Cura and Automarker. Cura has so many great features that why target developing a competitive product (depends on your long term strategy). Maybe better to drop software and focus on hardware advances with the (limited?) resources you have?
Just my two penneth from someone who developes business strategies in the aerospace sector. And don’t treat it as a criticism as I think there are many unique elements about Robox.. especially the nozzle design, infact the overall quality of the printer and the support you provide. @pete if you ever want to pick my brains feel free
Aerospace Engineer with a creative itch being scratched by Robox!
These have both been subjects for a long time, the size issue since day one but we all have dreams
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
