Home Forums Materials surface finish

This topic contains 14 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by  amuse 4 weeks ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9670
    Profile photo of paulsroom
    paulsroom @paulsroom

    xtc-3d-brush-on-coating-for-3d-printed-parts I wonder if anyone has come across this surface finish material for 3D prints, and in fact if they have used it. In the description it says it is self-levelling and does not require very much to coat the surface, but I wonder if the thickness may affect the original fine detail in a 3D print. I would think that it is not suitable for 3D printed parts that have to fit together. But as a perfectly smooth finish on a large object, it seems like a useful idea.

    • This topic was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by  paulsroom.
    #9673
    Profile photo of
    Anonymous

    If it fills in / smooths out striations then you will lose fine detail.

    #9717
    Profile photo of David
    David @dmullerdesign

    This reminds me of another question I wanted to ask. With my early prints, granted the Robox wasn’t behaving itself, you could pick away at the layers and unravel them post printing. In other words, the individual layers delaminated quite easily, meaning I could peel parts of the model away.

    I wondered whether the process of placing the model in a jar of heated acetone (creating a vapour which smooths out the individual striations through a process that slightly melts each layer into the next) would add some strength to the model overall. Having those layers slightly chemically melted into the next would surely add a little more rigidity, although as already pointed out it would remove any fine detail.

    #9725

    pelgrim @pelgrim

    waiting for AM to improve seems a better idea to me

    java (EE), JavaFX, HTML, GIS) programmer, database wizard, framework inventor, looking for a job ! http://roboxing.com/wizards
    #9727
    Profile photo of David
    David @dmullerdesign

    Uh huh. You are, of course, correct. Fingers crossed not too much longer to wait. I can’t imagine coding for one OS is particularly easy, then add another two into the mix surely complicates things (that is Windows, Linux and Mac OS).

    #9729

    René @3dnerd

    @David: AM is written in JAVA so they have to write the code only once because JAVA is available on many OS’s.
    Maybe they only have to do minor fittings…

    #9730

    pelgrim @pelgrim

    Coding java and javafx for different OS does not affect the programming at all when it concerns calculations, interacting with slic3r, processing gcode, communicating with the usb port, …
    The only thing that differs is some technical details if you access non-standard hardware and the UI appearance, an OS has a mind of it’s own about t that.

    So to put it simple: OS has no influence on print quality.

    But don’t underestimate the complexity of the maths and translating the theoretical model into physical machine instructions,
    I don’t really expect things to be right in 2014. We’re not talking about some small fixes here and there, but the basics that have to be solid.

    java (EE), JavaFX, HTML, GIS) programmer, database wizard, framework inventor, looking for a job ! http://roboxing.com/wizards
    #9745
    Profile photo of gid
    gid @gid

    Yep. We used to say that Java was “Write Once; Crash Everywhere”.

    Tom Gidden -- Bristol, UK -- New Roboxer? Check out the wiki, and add yourself to the map! http://roboxing.com/user_locations
    #9748

    Clicky @clicky

    :p

    signed,

    Java developer! :)

    • This reply was modified 4 weeks, 1 day ago by Profile photo of Clicky Clicky.
    #9751

    pelgrim @pelgrim

    “covering that last message of Tom”
    nope, saw nothing, java is good :)

    java (EE), JavaFX, HTML, GIS) programmer, database wizard, framework inventor, looking for a job ! http://roboxing.com/wizards
    #9758
    Profile photo of gid
    gid @gid

    Last time I did a big project in it was in the mid- to late-nineties. It might be okay by now. :)

    Tom Gidden -- Bristol, UK -- New Roboxer? Check out the wiki, and add yourself to the map! http://roboxing.com/user_locations
    #9764

    pelgrim @pelgrim

    ok, we’re way off topic, but who cares …
    Java had its surface finish with javafx.

    I stepped in the java 2.0 game end 2001, after years of frustration with bluescreens in the Micky$oft environment, Access no less, and everything that smelled like VB,
    and a few years later I gradually changed to linux.
    Never got a crash again while developping, and I never looked back again, although I must say the change to linux is a lot easier today than it was +10 years ago.

    java (EE), JavaFX, HTML, GIS) programmer, database wizard, framework inventor, looking for a job ! http://roboxing.com/wizards
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 15 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.