pburgess

Follow-up to my prior post: yes, found a way to do this permanently, so there’s no need to fiddle scaling settings for every model. Adjust the steps-per-unit values in the gcode console:

M503

(displays current settings — you should see a line that starts ‘M92 X132.333 Y132.333′)

M92 X133.45 Y133.5

(sets new X/Y steps-per-unit slightly larger…[Read more]

Follow-up to my prior post: yes, found a way to do this permanently, so there’s no need to fiddle scaling settings for every model. Adjust the steps-per-unit values in the gcode console:

M503 (displays current settings — you should see a line that starts ‘M92 X132.333 Y132.333′)

M92 X133.45 Y133.5 (sets new X/Y steps-per-unit slightly larger -…[Read more]

Follow-up to my prior post: yes, found a way to do this permanently, so there’s no need to fiddle scaling settings for every model. Adjust the steps-per-unit values in the gcode console:

M503 (displays current settings — you should see a line that starts ‘M92 X132.333 Y132.333′)

M92 X133.4 Y133.45 (sets new X/Y steps-per-unit slightly larger -…[Read more]

I’m seeing this 1-2% too-small phenomenon whether printing PLA -or- ABS. Tested on multiple models. Is it possible the steps-per-mm is just slightly out of whack in the firmware? Exact same models print correctly on a Printrbot, no scale-by-N kludge necessary.